This page looks plain and unstyled because you're using a non-standard compliant browser. To see it in its best form, please upgrade to a browser that supports web standards. It's free and painless.
kilomentor | 19 September, 2008 12:15
It is the opinion of Kilomentor that the most significant presentation at the Scientific Update Process Development Conference held in Montreal from June 24-26th of this year was that of Alex Tao, Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer of Bioverdant. Dr. Tao was a recipient of the 2006 IChemE-AstraZeneca award for Excellence in Green Chemistry and Engineering for his process for Pregabalin. What I hear Dr. Tao saying is that the state of scientific knowledge now calls for a paradigm shift in our perspective on organic chemical process development most particularly for pharmaceuticals.
According to the presentation, because of the availability now of so much genomic data, the number of enzymes available for conducting the equivalent of common API process steps has increased to the point that now such a broad substrate spectrum can be handled that a screen for potential enzymes to catalyze a reaction step is more likely than not to provide a usable hit. This means that for the first time in history, chemists can be optimistic that they will be able to identify an enzyme, available in commercial quantities, that will catalyze any one of a dozen very common chemical conversions.
Furthermore, even if the best wild-type enzyme discovered has only a poor enantiomeric selectivity for the substrate of interest, the science of site-directed mutagenesis has developed so quickly that a wild-type enzyme that only provides say 61.4% of the correct enantiomer can be used to create a new mutant enzyme with 99.5% ee in something like 3-6 months more work and this can be scaled up to provide production quantities.
This Dr. Tao confirmed to me would make it very likely that, if the innovating company has not already done so, a generic pharmaceutical company can expect to improve the route available to make drugs coming off patent using these biocatalytic methods. Moreover, this opportunity is more likely because the technology was not available in its present robust state when the innovator was developing its chemistry.
Using one biotransformation in a process usually removes the need for any resolution because only one enantiomer reacts. This also opens up the possibility of racemizing the wrong enantiomer and so recycling the 50% of the racemic intermediate that is usually not useful. Also prochiral intermediates give chiral products with enzymes; in one step resolving the intermediate and selecting one of two superficially identical groups.
The reactions that can be confidently replaced now are:
In his presentation Dr. Tao provided examples of completed improvements for synthesizing levetiracetam, montelukast, pregabalin, (S)-dimethenamid (an agricultural product), synthetic pyrethroids (insecticides), moxifloxacin, paroxetine and atorvastatin.
Ryan K. | 20/09/2008, 17:37
marto | 22/09/2008, 05:19
Hello KM,
I am really gratful to you for your articles in this blog. Its been a great learning experince for me. Could you please mention about any lead refs for this Biocatalytic methods...Book titles are also really helpful..I would like to develop knowledge on this front..
Cheers
Marto
| « | January 2009 | » | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Love your blog. Thank you for taking the time to write up this information!