kilomentor | 25 March, 2013 19:01
I received the following comment regarding a recent blog post.
Dear Kilomentor,
I am trying to isolate CF3COAr (80% w/w assay) derivative
compound from the ArBr (10% w/w and Piperidine COCF3 derivative (10% w/w)
mixture . CF3COAr derivative is low melting solid (mp ~ 52 °C) and I don’t have
the distillation data of the same. I just would like to know whether bisulfite
adduct isolation can be attempted on 25 kg scale or which method you would
suggest. Small scale preparation involves isolation by precipitation in
cylcohexane (~ 50 % recovery) at lower temp (- 20 °C). Please suggest me if you
have any experience.
Dear Marto,
Certainly the carbonyl of your desired product is electrophilic enough to react
with bisulfite! My slight concern is that the trifluoromethyl anion might be
displaced in a competing fragmentation reaction. A small scale test would
quickly find this out. The conditions will need to be mild. This is an
excellent example where isolating an easily reversed derivative should easily
remove some substantial impurities. Note that it is not necessary that the
bisulfite adduct actually precipitate for the method to work. It is sufficient
that the ionic sodium bisulfite salt form and be extracted into an aqueous
phase. If an appropriate inert, water-immiscible organic layer is also provided
the bromobenzene and the piperidine trifluoroacetamide will remain substantially
in the organic layer while the bisulfite adduct is in the water. Separating the
liquid phases and acidification breaking the adduct should allow the
trifluoroacetophenone to be taken back into a fresh organic layer from which it can
be crystallized, precipitated or used directly in a subsequent reaction.
A separate concept can be used to remove the piperidine trifluoroacetamide, if
it were somehow to still contaminate your product. It would seem it can be
removed from your product mixture by treatment with some aqueous hydrochloric
acid with a small amount of acetic acid cosolvent to promote solubility. This tertiary amide
is probably rather sensitive to acid catalyzed hydrolysis because of the strong
electron withdrawing strength of the trifluoromethyl. Furthermore, both
hydrolysis cleavage products, piperidine hydrochloride, trifluoracetic acid as
well as the acetic acid cosolvent all go to water. Although
trifluoroacetophenone might have some sensitivity to basic fragmentation, it
will be untouched by aqueous acid.
Bear in mind always, however, that what is done by way of purification is always
dependent upon how you plan to use the product. If the subsequent
transformations of your trifluoroacetophenone do not touch the impurities you
have, then later separation may be easier or more convenient, or better still, the
subsequent reactions may purge them for you. Even an intermediate with a rather
low purity, like your 80%, might be practically pure enough, if the impurities
don’t use up expensive reagents and don’t produce even more troublesome impurities
by reacting further. Bear in mind though when using a low assay intermediate
such as yours to do subsequent chemistry that your assay must be accurate
because the upcoming stoichiometry will be dependent upon it!
kilomentor | 05 March, 2013 03:47
Each reaction in a chemical process has solvents in which the conversion works
better and the preferred solvents for consecutive reactions in a scheme are usually
different. As a consequence performing solvent switches is key to telescoping
process steps thereby avoiding unnecessary intermediate isolations.
The boiling points of acetic acid and acetic anhydride respectively are 117 and
140 C. Acetic acid is infinitely miscible with water and is an excellent solvent
for broad classes of substances. Mixing solutes dissolved in the acid with
water leads to decreasing solubility of most organic compounds.
Acetic anhydride is a solvent that
reacts with solute molecules that have nucleophilic functionalities and
particularly those with what is termed active hydrogen. Because of its high
boiling point acetic anhydride can chase lower boiling solvents during
distillation. It can then be itself removed by hydrolysis to acetic acid,
optionally neutralized with dilute aqueous alkali, and washed away from
lipophilic materials with water. Heating a solvent mixture in which acetic
anhydride is a constituent dries it. Only enough acetic anhydride needs to be
added to a crude product to provide liquidity then distillation can be
continued until all the reaction solvent has been removed. Even if an acetate
ester or amide is formed during the isolation, that can be reversed by alkaline
hydrolysis after the solvent of the first reaction is removed.
Consider for example acetic anhydride’s potential for changing from the high boiling
solvent chlorobenzene to ethyl acetate before crystallization. In such a
scenario, a mixture of chlorobenzene and acetic anhydride could be distilled to
remove chlorobenzene and some acetic anhydride. The still pot comprises in
acetic anhydride and non-volatile reaction products. This residue does not
solidify because of the presence of acetic anhydride. The minimum stirrable
volume is maintained. Water is added along with the new second solvent which
must be water immiscible, in this case ethyl acetate. Dilute mineral acid or
base may be added to accelerate hydrolysis of the acetic anhydride. The acetic
acid or acetate anion dissolves in the aqueous phase and is removed. The
reaction mixture is left dissolved in the ethyl acetate.
In a different scenario, if the first solvent is low enough in boiling point, acetic
acid itself can serve as the chase liquid for distilling out the first solvent.
The product may not be particularly soluble in anhydrous acetic acid or the
acetic acid can be subsequently diluted with water used as an antisolvent to
cause precipitation or the acetic acid can be optionally neutralized and washed
away in water after adding the new water-immiscible second solvent.
Potentially chloroacetic acid and chloroacetic acid anhydride can be considered
for similar usage as acetic acid/acetic anhydride above. A key difference is
that the chloroacetic acid esters are more easily hydrolyzed and can even be
removed without exposure to either acid or base by treatment with thiourea.
kilomentor | 02 March, 2013 21:15
Do medicinal and pharmaceutical development chemists suffer a greater incidence
of cancers than the general population? This is a question for epidemiologists.
I don’t know whether the answer is known or not. I suspect from anecdotal data,
the answer is that our health is equal to or better than our peers. If this
turns out to be so, then this casts serious doubt on the level of concern regarding
genotoxic impurities. Let’s admit it. We medicinal and development chemists
have come into contact with many compounds that on the basis of structure would
be deemed likely genotoxic materials. If a substantial number of them are as
dangerous as is claimed, why are we still doing all right healthwise? This isn’t
to say we shouldn't take proper precautions, but remember, lots of us were doing
chemistry for years before anyone thought about genotoxicity. Just to exemplify the situation in the past, I can vividly
remember when I cleaned mercury metal by
wrapping it in a tea towel and squeezing it through into a large funnel using
my bare hands!
| « | March 2013 | » | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa | Su |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |