kilomentor | 29 April, 2012 20:04
In Organic
Synthesis Coll. Vol. II pg 279 there is a procedure for monomethylation of ethyl
malonate (diethyl methylmalonate). The crude, neat diester product is “shaken
for exactly one minute with a cold solution of 10 g. of sodium hydroxide in 30
cc. of water.” The corresponding note
reports that “[t]he ester is treated in this manner to remove any
unchanged ethyl malonate [diethyl malonate]. Michael1 has shown that this
treatment will completely remove unchanged ethyl malonate [diethyl malonate]
while hardly attacking ethyl methylmalonate. No ethyl dimethyl-malonate is
formed when methyl bromide is used as the methylating agent….A separation of
the desired product from traces of unchanged starting material and from ethyl
dimethylmalonate cannot be accomplished by distillation as the boiling points
of the three esters lie within three and one-half degrees of one another.” The
notes contain this additional information. “Michael found that unchanged
malonic ester can be removed completely by taking advantage of the greater ease
with which it is hydrolyzed by alkali ….”The references are Michael, J. Prakt.
Chem. (2) 72, 537 (1905) and Fieser and Novello, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 62, 1856
(1940).
This appears to be an extraordinary
example of separation by competitive reaction using heterogeneous media. For
this to work the rate of hydrolysis of the starting material under these
conditions must be at least one hundred times faster than that for the
monomethyl product. Why would this be and how can other separations take advantage
of this? It might be that the deprotonation and extraction into the aqueous
basic phase of ethyl malonate in a vigorously agitated two phase mixture is
much faster for an unsubstituted ethyl malonate than for one that is
substituted, even with a very small group like methyl. It is very much less likely
to relate to a difference in solubility between the ethyl and ethyl methyl
malonates or even of their respective monoanions. Once ethyl malonate gets deprotonated and
carried into the aqueous phase it is probably quickly further hydrolyzed to
give carboxylates which keep it there. Kilomentor has given other examples of
such ‘phase switching hydrolysis’ separating esters where there is a free
phenol in only one component of a binary mixture and calls the method. http://kilomentor.chemicalblogs.com/55_kilomentor/archive/1011_extractive_and_phase_switching_hydrolysis_in_chemical_process_development.html
If the hypothesized explanation is correct this technique would be generally
applicable in any monoalkylation of ethyl malonate with a hydrophobic side
chain. It would mean that an excess of the inexpensive ethyl malonate could be
used in such alkylation to speed up the overall rate in the knowledge that the
excess ethyl malonate could be easily removed by alkaline hydrolysis and a
water wash. This would also allow the amount of dialkylation to be reduced to
essentially nothing.
| « | May 2013 | » | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa | Su |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Competitive hydrolysis
Slawomir | 30/04/2012, 07:06
That "shaking for 1 minute" would be hard to scale-up in batch mode. However, it seems to fit a continuous process just fine.
Some time ago when I made malonates for a living it was easier to over-alkylate and separate the mono product by distillation (the di-alkyl malonate was left in the pot).